Jerusalem,
Jerusalem, how often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen
gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing!
Welcome to our first attempt at a Celtic
Eucharistic liturgy. You may already
have an inkling its spirituality sets a different tone from what we normally
encounter on a Sunday morning. It is more
Trinitarian and focused on God’s guidance, God’s protection, and God’s
mercy. The God meet through Western
Christianity has taken on a therapeutic persona. Our God is there when needed, available for
council and comfort, wise but not meddling, and encouraging of all our good
endeavors. God, as made known through Celtic
spirituality, is engaged in a cosmic struggle while remaining unimaginably
close to us. This closeness is manifested
through companionship and connection to the mystical beauty of the countryside.
Today we encounter the God of Tolkein’s The Lord of the Rings, rather than the
God of Jan Karon’s Mitford series.
Our reading from the Book of Genesis blends
comfortably with Celtic spirituality. It
is concerned with one of the most basic functions of all living organisms – the
need to propagate. It finds spiritual
truth and hope in the stars of the night sky.
And it presents us with an image of God far different than a
white-bearded, grandfatherly figure sitting on a golden throne floating on a
billowy cloud.
God and Abraham engage in the ritual of an
ancient Middle-Eastern covenant ceremony.
Today, when two country’s leaders sign a treaty, they exchange
pens. In Abraham’s day the ceremony was
much more graphic. Various animals, both
large and small, are gathered, killed, and their carcasses cut in half. The halves are pulled apart to create a bloody
path in between, which those entering into the covenant walk barefoot between,
their feet and clothing becoming stained in the process. As they walk they recite a series of
blessings and curses – the conditions of the covenant and what will follow
based on adherence or disregard. In
essence, each party expresses a willingness to be like the slaughtered beasts
through which they walk if they prove unfaithful. (And you thought getting a mortgage was an
undertaking!)
God promises to provide Abraham with a son,
and even more, that his offspring will be as innumerable as the stars. Abraham wants to believe, but needs a
sign. God directs him to lay out what is
necessary for a covenant ceremony. As
night approaches Abraham falls into a fitful, trancelike sleep. The text tells us a smoking fire pot and a
flaming torch pass between the animal pieces.
These two symbols – perhaps related to how God protects the Israelites
fleeing from Egypt as a cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night – stand for
God in the ritual. Abraham himself does
not enter into the gruesome walk; indicating God already deems his faith
sufficient to seal the covenant and God assumes all the consequences for
failure by Abraham or his offspring.
Middle-Eastern covenants bind behavior by
defining how each party will and will not act and what each party will offer
and receive from the relationship. The
bible tells us God enters into covenants with Noah, Abraham, Moses, and the
people of Israel (through the ceremony we read about in last week’s Old
Testament lesson). As we partake of the
Body and Blood of Christ we remember we have entered into a new covenant with
God made possible through the work Jesus our Savior.
Each of the biblical figures who enters into
a covenant with God does so freely. The
same is true for us. We are neither
forced nor coerced. We can follow or we
can forge different path. We can act
with affection towards others or we can be alienated one from another. We can be like chicks huddling under the
protective wings of the mother hen or we can run amuck in the world. The choice is ours. God gives us the freedom to choose. But why?
Why does God allow us to obey or to disobey? Why does God assume the consequences of our
unfaithfulness? Why did God create a
world where things can go so wrong?
I just finished reading Robin Wall
Kimmerer’s book Gathering Moss, which
I quoted in a sermon last fall and then received as a gift for Christmas. It has been a wonderful devotional-type read
that has helped me to feel closer to our natural world. Kimmerer describes the interconnectedness of
every aspect of forest life. Every
organism, great or small, has a role to play.
It finds its niche in greater community – taking what it needs, giving
what it doesn’t, doing something that is necessary for others. For instance, did you know that a slug moving
over moss picks up spores on its slimy underside and carries them several
inches, thus providing the possibility the moss will reproduce in a new
location?
Within the vast network of a forest there
is little freedom. Yes, the slug may
turn this way or that. A bird may choose
to float on the wind or to work against it.
A falling leaf may or may not be carried off by the breeze. Still, all things great and small are predisposed
to do their particular part. So why are
we humans so different? Why can’t we be
a part of the bigger system without having the possibility of doing so much
damage to it? Why, at times, do was take
more than we need, refuse to give what we have, and neglect to do our part for
the common good?
In one chapter of her book Kimmerer
describes a time she was hired to consult on a private development. An extremely wealthy individual building a
mansion on a huge expanse of property wanted to recreate an authentic
Appalachian forest on the site. No
expense was spared in this effort and Kimmerer was called in to consult on the
mosses involved, which hints at the scope of the undertaking.
Well, it turns out you can’t just pick up a
clump of moss from one place, put it down in another, keep it moist, and expect
it to survive. Moss, in all its
varieties, is delicately situated in a place with specific kinds of nutrients,
air-quality, sunlight/shade, partnering organisms, and a host of other
factors. You can’t just pick it up and
move it. Kimmerer notes the owner behind
the project really did want to want to recreate an authentic ecosystem and took
elaborate steps to make it happen, but his desire to control the process of
growth ruined what he hoped to create.
She then quotes Barbara Kingsolver who
wrote, “It’s going to take the most selfless kind of love to do right by what
we cherish and give it the protection to flourish outside our possessive embrace.” I have read and reread this quote nearly a
dozen times and there is so much in it I still can’t quite get my head around.
It’s going to take
the most selfless kind of love to do right by what we cherish and give it the
protection to flourish outside our possessive embrace.
Celtic spirituality is grounded in creation
as the Creator had made it. God has
created the forest to be a dynamic, interconnected ecosystem that, while
random, lacks the freedom of choice. God
created the human family desiring we each have freedom. While God could force each person to be like
a brood finding love, protection, and comfort under divine wings, our response
means more when it is entered into freely.
God’s selfless love eschews the possibility of a smothering, possessive
embrace. Our free will, our faithful
response, elicits God’s deep joy.
We see so much in our world which must
please the One who created all things and we so much which must not. Our own lives are no different. We choose at times to be faithful and we
choose at times to forsake the terms of the covenant we have embraced. But through it all we are free. The choice is always ours. Today, through our Celtic liturgy, we bind
ourselves again to the strong name of the Trinity: God the Father, God the Son,
and God the Holy Spirit. May we know God
close enough to be a companion and source of strength and may we sense the
restraint of God’s selfless love which invites our faithful response without
smothering us in a possessive embrace.